Death of a Salesman. Thanks to a generous donation by the
Daddy foundation, I was finally able to see this show.
Here’s the thing, I LOVE Miller – probably more than a
single human should. I love him
for reasons I will talk about later in this blog even.
It should come as no big surprise then that I LOVED this
version of it. I mean, I’m not
gonna say Miller is easy, because I don’t think he is. However, when he is done well, it is
effortless to watch the story unfold on stage. Miller believed this story to be a layer cake of time (his
analogy, not mine), and this version does that brilliantly – moving through
walls in the past and obeying them in the present – subtle but effective. Honestly, my big problem
with the show was Phillip Seymor Hoffman. I really wanted him to use his mouth more so I could
understand him more. I thought
Andrew Garfield held his own with PSH and Linda Edmond though. (Though, to be honest, my date had to
tell me that Garfield was famous…
I’m bad at that game.) I do
think that this production did an interesting thing by making Biff’s character
far more central to the story than I think I have ever seen or read it as. To be honest, I loved it and re-read
the script to see what I had missed in my prior readings to miss that. I’m not saying that Biff isn’t always
important, I think he is. But in
my head, and when I read it, this is Willy’s show, and the other characters
support Willy. In this version,
however, Biff’s story was just as important by itself as Willy’s – willing to
admit this might be a fault in the way I was reading it, but this is my third
production of it, and my first to have the realization, so I feel confident
that it isn’t just me.
And now we get to why I love Miller so much.
In undergrad, I had a WONDERFUL prof, Doc Berger, and he
taught me many things. One that we
totally disagreed on was Miller.
We fought about it on more than one occasion. And the basic fight was this: Doc believed that there were no playwrights as great as
Shakes since that time, because, he said, no one was universal or as timeless
as Shakes is. I disagreed. I say Miller has hit upon some very
universal truths of his own. As
proof, I offered The Crucible and Death of a Salesman. One of the longest debates the two of
us ever had was over Death. (Made all the more ironic because he
directed Death the next year.) (Also, The Crucible? Because
what is less universal across the ages and globe than a small group of people
holding a larger group of people hostage through fear?)
One of the amazing things about this show was that it
reminded me of this old debate, and, I think, helped prove me right.
All shows should speak to the audience that watches it. That’s what it means to be
universal. Watching a show and
seeing what the society that produced it might have thought, and what the
society (or part of it) who is currently watching it is thinking, I think, is
the pentacle of the universal timeless play. To me, this production speaks of a world moving on without
the older generation, of a world that cares more about fancy toys than human
beings – in modern terms, Willy Lohman is the 99%.
More than economics,, this show speaks to what it means to
live your dreams, to understand what your dreams are. Miller asks us to be honest with ourselves about our past
and what it means. I mean,
everyone polishes up their past; everyone is the protagonist in their own
story; everyone wants to believe the best in themselves and those around them,
those they love. But Miller
reminds us that those of us who are strong enough to see who we really are,
what we are really capable of, what we have really want, what we have really done, who we have really hurt, who we have really helped and what we really are
the ones who walk away with the ground firmly under our feet and an actual
chance at happiness. Miller
reminds us that it is by putting your brain and it’s false beliefs and remembrances
aside and listening and accepting the truth of your soul and heart that you
find where you are supposed to be.
Thank you for that universal truth Arthur Miller. It means as much today as when you
wrote it. And I feel certain that
it will mean just as much in 100 years.
Cool story... liked. :)
ReplyDeleteI think you and I need to be in each other's lives creatively again.......some day, lol.
ReplyDelete